BatlawAI
mrbabai
lexilee1995
sahilnakum
GeeJay
CaligirlMar420
skarnik1
hollywoodhotmail
way2freaky
ahmolonry
Dancules2818
Steni8
Watching 7
felipemassafera
AdmiraWijaya
Mami02
iurypadilha
manikai
veripwolf
Superman-WonderWoman
Collection
Favourites
Artist // Hobbyist // Digital Art
- United Kingdom
- Deviant for 14 years
Badges
My Bio
Just refusing to grow up while messing around with pictures
"One of the surest tests [of the superiority or inferiority of a poet] is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different than that from which it is torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest."
Eliot, T.S., “Philip Massinger,” The Sacred Wood, New York: Bartleby.com, 2000.
"One of the surest tests [of the superiority or inferiority of a poet] is the way in which a poet borrows. Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different. The good poet welds his theft into a whole of feeling which is unique, utterly different than that from which it is torn; the bad poet throws it into something which has no cohesion. A good poet will usually borrow from authors remote in time, or alien in language, or diverse in interest."
Eliot, T.S., “Philip Massinger,” The Sacred Wood, New York: Bartleby.com, 2000.
Profile Comments 13
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
hi, thanks for watching, and the fave. it's nice to meet you over here too 
Hey, thanks for the watch! Glad you like my stuff)))
Deviantart is not photobucket. You should remove artworks you DO NOT have permission to use from your account before you are banned.
Go ahead. Do your worst.
No offence was intended. These are all copyrighted characters in any event, it's pretty hard to claim ownership of a very generic idea / pose when you are using someone else's property in the first place.
Looking for reasons to be offended is a dangerous business. For example your nick' superspazkiki, well Kiki, I assume it's Kiki, let me break that down for you super spaz Kiki, well spaz is an offensive pejorative to many, a diminutive of spastic, which refers to a medical condition - especially cerebal palsy and spastic diplegia. So I would ask you to consider adopting a less offensive name lest someone less tolerant than me complains to administration.
No offence was intended. These are all copyrighted characters in any event, it's pretty hard to claim ownership of a very generic idea / pose when you are using someone else's property in the first place.
Looking for reasons to be offended is a dangerous business. For example your nick' superspazkiki, well Kiki, I assume it's Kiki, let me break that down for you super spaz Kiki, well spaz is an offensive pejorative to many, a diminutive of spastic, which refers to a medical condition - especially cerebal palsy and spastic diplegia. So I would ask you to consider adopting a less offensive name lest someone less tolerant than me complains to administration.
Do my worst? That's cute.
Just because you didn't intend to offend doesn't mean you didn't offend. Yes they are copyrighted characters but you don't seem to understand the drawing itself is the intellectual property of the artist. You didn't just use a 'generic' pose. You used her exact drawing, mirrored the image, and dropped different colors onto it. That's very different than just referencing the image.
I'm not looking for reasons to be offended. Although art theft tends to offend me.
By the way, you really shouldn't assume. You do know what they say about people that assume correct? Also. If you're going to talk about the 'spaz' portion of my username you should probably get the definition right. Here. I'll get the dictionary definition for you.
spaz- noun
1. an awkward, clumsy, or eccentric person.
Damn. What do you know. Not your definition. So go ahead. Complain about a username I've had for -years- as there is nothing wrong with it.
Just because you didn't intend to offend doesn't mean you didn't offend. Yes they are copyrighted characters but you don't seem to understand the drawing itself is the intellectual property of the artist. You didn't just use a 'generic' pose. You used her exact drawing, mirrored the image, and dropped different colors onto it. That's very different than just referencing the image.
I'm not looking for reasons to be offended. Although art theft tends to offend me.
By the way, you really shouldn't assume. You do know what they say about people that assume correct? Also. If you're going to talk about the 'spaz' portion of my username you should probably get the definition right. Here. I'll get the dictionary definition for you.
spaz- noun
1. an awkward, clumsy, or eccentric person.
Damn. What do you know. Not your definition. So go ahead. Complain about a username I've had for -years- as there is nothing wrong with it.
Excuse me for jumping in here but I spoke to the artist lady condom via tumblr...and she was extremely gracious about the whole thing. She took no offense but we and the artist here has acknowledged it is her piece and seeing others are offended on her behalf and to avoid this kind of confrontation...it is taken down because rudecherub never meant to offend anyone. And in terms of copyright, can I add those classic iconic images are all over deviantart from the Klimt's The Kiss, Mona Lisa to VE Day and that is a bit unfair to threaten on them.Hell Jim Lee's and Adam Hughes art is often used as well as reference and original images used inversion to ship characters. So we need to get some perspective and balance here too.
View all replies